<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excuse me, What is your private information doing in my Inbox?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/</link>
	<description>Hack it, Break it, Fix it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 05:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-85573</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-85573</guid>
		<description>@John McCreadie
From: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/02/how-remove-your-google-search-history-googles-new-privacy-policy-takes-effect&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eff.com&lt;/a&gt; As of March 1st, Google will implement its new, unified privacy policy, which will affect data Google has collected on you prior to March 1st as well as data it collects on you in the future. Until now, your Google Web History (your Google searches and sites visited) was cordoned off from Google&#039;s other products.

This could mean that the data collected scanning your gmail can be combined with data on which websites you visit or which searches you conducted, all to build a better profile of who you are and what you like. This profile can be used to sell better and more relevant advertisement and/or a social network, Google+, profile for you.

I have a love/hate relationship with Google. I admire the company for their products and the innovation. I&#039;m a little scared with the information Google is collecting and what it will be used for in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John McCreadie<br />
From: <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/02/how-remove-your-google-search-history-googles-new-privacy-policy-takes-effect" rel="nofollow">eff.com</a> As of March 1st, Google will implement its new, unified privacy policy, which will affect data Google has collected on you prior to March 1st as well as data it collects on you in the future. Until now, your Google Web History (your Google searches and sites visited) was cordoned off from Google&#8217;s other products.</p>
<p>This could mean that the data collected scanning your gmail can be combined with data on which websites you visit or which searches you conducted, all to build a better profile of who you are and what you like. This profile can be used to sell better and more relevant advertisement and/or a social network, Google+, profile for you.</p>
<p>I have a love/hate relationship with Google. I admire the company for their products and the innovation. I&#8217;m a little scared with the information Google is collecting and what it will be used for in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCreadie</title>
		<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-85533</link>
		<dc:creator>John McCreadie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-85533</guid>
		<description>I too have concerns about someone at Google Mail reading my mail and putting in ads associated with their content. For example; recently I received mail from a friend telling me she was seeing a specialist 
because she had some sudden medical problem. Straight away there were ads saying GP training, First Pregnancy, some thing or the other and Find a Doctor. On the face of it it seems to be fairly innocuous, but what would you think if you were just notified that someone close had been killed in an accident and next to this; were ads for Funeral Directors, and the like.
I have another issue with Google Mail; I recently inadvertently sent a whole manuscript (of my life story
I am 81) instead of an extract, to an email address which no longer belongs to the people in question and that it had been allocated to someone else. I could not find out who they were, so I sent an email to gmail@google.com asking for help. It bounced back with a whole lot of gobbledegook, which meant nothing to me, I thought perhaps I had done some thing wrong in the first draft, so I amended it and re-sent it and the same thing happened. Fancy not being able to send an email to the email provider. I suspect they don&#039;t want to have anything to do with the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have concerns about someone at Google Mail reading my mail and putting in ads associated with their content. For example; recently I received mail from a friend telling me she was seeing a specialist<br />
because she had some sudden medical problem. Straight away there were ads saying GP training, First Pregnancy, some thing or the other and Find a Doctor. On the face of it it seems to be fairly innocuous, but what would you think if you were just notified that someone close had been killed in an accident and next to this; were ads for Funeral Directors, and the like.<br />
I have another issue with Google Mail; I recently inadvertently sent a whole manuscript (of my life story<br />
I am 81) instead of an extract, to an email address which no longer belongs to the people in question and that it had been allocated to someone else. I could not find out who they were, so I sent an email to <a href="mailto:gmail@google.com">gmail@google.com</a> asking for help. It bounced back with a whole lot of gobbledegook, which meant nothing to me, I thought perhaps I had done some thing wrong in the first draft, so I amended it and re-sent it and the same thing happened. Fancy not being able to send an email to the email provider. I suspect they don&#8217;t want to have anything to do with the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imagine receiving someone else’s Gmail &#124; 42257</title>
		<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-15822</link>
		<dc:creator>Imagine receiving someone else’s Gmail &#124; 42257</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-15822</guid>
		<description>[...] could happen to you, says Dennis Goedegebuure: According to the Gmail help documents, there are a number of cases why email can get delivered in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could happen to you, says Dennis Goedegebuure: According to the Gmail help documents, there are a number of cases why email can get delivered in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [Keyword Spam Removed]</title>
		<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-13798</link>
		<dc:creator>[Keyword Spam Removed]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-13798</guid>
		<description>Really Great Post. Best wishes. Thanks

[&lt;strong&gt;Note from Admin&lt;/strong&gt;: Comment edited by admin due to keyword spam, next time use your real name instead of lame keywords. I&#039;m sure your real name is not &quot;Email Security Solutions&quot;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really Great Post. Best wishes. Thanks</p>
<p>[<strong>Note from Admin</strong>: Comment edited by admin due to keyword spam, next time use your real name instead of lame keywords. I'm sure your real name is not "Email Security Solutions"]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-11774</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-11774</guid>
		<description>@George the Foreman

Honestly, I would not feel bad if you assume if this is an user error. I really don&#039;t care if this is going to be solved, as long as this is not happening with my emails.

I have seen the emails that I have received, which were replies to an original email which originated with the person I got the email for. I let this person know, and his response was shocking. He had received all the emails I had in my inbox, so it was clear the emails were being delivered in both inboxes.

I&#039;m not going to paste the header info here, as that will expose email addresses and more. 

I will wait patiently for an answer from Google, but I doubt they will ever take on this case with the &lt;a href=http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;China nightmare&lt;/a&gt; they have on their hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@George the Foreman</p>
<p>Honestly, I would not feel bad if you assume if this is an user error. I really don&#8217;t care if this is going to be solved, as long as this is not happening with my emails.</p>
<p>I have seen the emails that I have received, which were replies to an original email which originated with the person I got the email for. I let this person know, and his response was shocking. He had received all the emails I had in my inbox, so it was clear the emails were being delivered in both inboxes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to paste the header info here, as that will expose email addresses and more. </p>
<p>I will wait patiently for an answer from Google, but I doubt they will ever take on this case with the <a href=http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html rel="nofollow">China nightmare</a> they have on their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George the Foreman</title>
		<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-11759</link>
		<dc:creator>George the Foreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-11759</guid>
		<description>I was afraid they might not reply.  I suspect that they have checked out that sort of complaint thoroughly, but they are deluged with that sort of inquiry, in spite of the FAQ on their Web site to deal with it.

My thinking is this.  UNIX is 40 years old, and Linux is 15 years or so.  And Google has surely delivered many billions of e-mail messages over several years.  By now, surely that software has been VERY thoroughly tested.

On the other hand, it is not at all hard to imagine someone typing in smith@google.com instead of smith1234@google.com SOMEWHERE in the process.  There are quite a few possibilities for entering a wrong address:  the From address, the Reply-to address, forwarding address, or just a random address from an address book--and probably some none of us has thought about.  In the absence of headers or ANY solid information other than the fact that you received some mail, I see no reason to assume anything other than human error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was afraid they might not reply.  I suspect that they have checked out that sort of complaint thoroughly, but they are deluged with that sort of inquiry, in spite of the FAQ on their Web site to deal with it.</p>
<p>My thinking is this.  UNIX is 40 years old, and Linux is 15 years or so.  And Google has surely delivered many billions of e-mail messages over several years.  By now, surely that software has been VERY thoroughly tested.</p>
<p>On the other hand, it is not at all hard to imagine someone typing in <a href="mailto:smith@google.com">smith@google.com</a> instead of <a href="mailto:smith1234@google.com">smith1234@google.com</a> SOMEWHERE in the process.  There are quite a few possibilities for entering a wrong address:  the From address, the Reply-to address, forwarding address, or just a random address from an address book&#8211;and probably some none of us has thought about.  In the absence of headers or ANY solid information other than the fact that you received some mail, I see no reason to assume anything other than human error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-11112</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-11112</guid>
		<description>@George Foreman

I sent the header information and an explanation to the email address you stated above here on December 22nd.
I heard nothing back, I only got the standard auto response email that they have received my email.

Furthermore, I contacted the guy whose emails I was receiving. He has a new email address set up, and had to change all his auto delivery of emails again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@George Foreman</p>
<p>I sent the header information and an explanation to the email address you stated above here on December 22nd.<br />
I heard nothing back, I only got the standard auto response email that they have received my email.</p>
<p>Furthermore, I contacted the guy whose emails I was receiving. He has a new email address set up, and had to change all his auto delivery of emails again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George the Foreman</title>
		<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-10812</link>
		<dc:creator>George the Foreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-10812</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the sarcasm, but this really needs attention, and Google is best equipped to handle it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the sarcasm, but this really needs attention, and Google is best equipped to handle it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George the Foreman</title>
		<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-10765</link>
		<dc:creator>George the Foreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-10765</guid>
		<description>The normal procedure when finding what you think is a security bug that might affect millions of people is to report it to the company that you think made the mistake.  That&#039;s called a bug report.

I looked it up for you.  Google&#039;s security page is here:  http://www.google.com/corporate/security.html .  That page explains what to do.  You can send your e-mail to security@google.com .  Don&#039;t bother with a screen capture.  Just copy and paste the damn headers, OK?

Now, since you already blogged about it without producing the evidence, I&#039;d say you owe everyone a confirmed bug report.  We don&#039;t need the whole report.  Just the number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The normal procedure when finding what you think is a security bug that might affect millions of people is to report it to the company that you think made the mistake.  That&#8217;s called a bug report.</p>
<p>I looked it up for you.  Google&#8217;s security page is here:  <a href="http://www.google.com/corporate/security.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/corporate/security.html</a> .  That page explains what to do.  You can send your e-mail to <a href="mailto:security@google.com">security@google.com</a> .  Don&#8217;t bother with a screen capture.  Just copy and paste the damn headers, OK?</p>
<p>Now, since you already blogged about it without producing the evidence, I&#8217;d say you owe everyone a confirmed bug report.  We don&#8217;t need the whole report.  Just the number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-10738</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextcorner.net/gmail-security-breach/#comment-10738</guid>
		<description>True, but if you think I make the point you should not use GMail because Google has deactivated the email account, you are missing the point.

I argue that you should be careful using free email accounts, as your emails could be redirected to somebodies inbox based on eMail address similarities. 

Apart from Google scanning your emails to match it with ads, more people might be reading your email. More than you might know!

That&#039;s all I wanted to post here. You can do whatever with this information you like.
If you don&#039;t like the message, I&#039;m sorry, but that&#039;s going to be your problem then. 
My problem is that I&#039;m getting more and more emails from this guy in my inbox. It&#039;s cluttering my inbox,  as I&#039;m even getting read confirmations from the people he sends emails to.

But thank you for researching the case, and thank you for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but if you think I make the point you should not use GMail because Google has deactivated the email account, you are missing the point.</p>
<p>I argue that you should be careful using free email accounts, as your emails could be redirected to somebodies inbox based on eMail address similarities. </p>
<p>Apart from Google scanning your emails to match it with ads, more people might be reading your email. More than you might know!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all I wanted to post here. You can do whatever with this information you like.<br />
If you don&#8217;t like the message, I&#8217;m sorry, but that&#8217;s going to be your problem then.<br />
My problem is that I&#8217;m getting more and more emails from this guy in my inbox. It&#8217;s cluttering my inbox,  as I&#8217;m even getting read confirmations from the people he sends emails to.</p>
<p>But thank you for researching the case, and thank you for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

